SELLARS AND THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN :: essays research papers

SELLARS AND THE "MYTH OF THE GIVEN"To be presented at the Eastern Division APA Meeting to be held at the Washington Hilton & Towers (Washington, DC) on Dec. 27 - 30, 1998 Book discussion Wilfrid Sellarss Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind (International Ballroom West, Wed., Dec. 30, 130 p.m. - 430 p.m.) -- Published with the permission of Prof. Alston.Since the body of the paper result be distinctly critical, I would like to begin by paying tribute to Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind (EPM) as one of the seminal flora of twentieth century philosophy. I still remember the growing excitement with which I read it when it first came out in Volume I of the manganese Studies in the Philosophy of Science (1956), in the Detroit Airport, of all places. (My colleague, Tamar Gendler, remarked to me that I was probably the only person thither reading Wilfrid Sellars, the others, no doubt, reading best sellers.) oer the ensuing decades the excitement, though never wholly exti nguished, has been adulterated by numerous second thoughts, some of which will be expounded here.Having already taken issue with Sellars habitual argument against immediate knowledge in section VIII of EPM and elsewhere, in my essay "Whats Wrong with Immediate Knowledge?"1, I will concentrate here on his complaints about "the given". But I must admit at the outset that it is not easy to pin down the target to which Sellars applies that title. At the beginning of EPM Sellars makes it explicit that though "I begin my argument with an attack on sense-datum theories, it is only as a first step in a critique of the entire framework of givenness". (128)2 But just what is this "framework of givenness" of which sense-datum theory is only one form? A bit later he says ". . . the station of the epistemological category of the given is, presumably, to explicate the idea that empirical knowledge rests on a foundation of non-inferential knowledge of matter o f fact". (128) That makes it sound as if some(prenominal) foundationalist epistemology is a form of the "myth of the given". And I am far from sure that this is not the way Sellars is thinking of it. Nevertheless, for present purposes I will encounter the commitment to the given as more restricted than that, identifying it with one particular way of thinking of "non-inferential knowledge of matter of fact".